1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from [email protected] or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    A half cracker activist appointee...wouldathunkthatshit.
     
  2. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    81,996
    This will stand just exactly as long as it takes to be appealed to the 9th circus, upheld there, and appealed to the supreme court where it will go down in flames.
     
  3. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    26,379
    Arizona AG warns of potential border threat from terrorists freed by Taliban in Afghanistan
    A top border patrol official said that terrorists coming through the border is 'a real threat'


    FIRST ON FOX: Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich – the latest Republican to link the border crisis to the situation in Afghanistan – is warning of a potential terrorist threat via the southern border from prisoners being freed by the Taliban.

    In a letter to President Biden, Brnovich pointed to comments made by former Border Patrol Chief Rodney Scott about the threat of terrorists potentially making their way through the southern border amid the ongoing migration crisis facing the U.S.



    "I firmly believe that it is a national security crisis," Scott said in a video message to agents, as reported by The Washington Examiner. "Immigration is just a subcomponent of it, and right now, it’s just a cover for massive amounts of smuggling going across the southwest border — to include TSDBs at a level we have never seen before. That's a real threat."

    TSDBs refers to migrants whose names match those on the Terrorist Screening Center Database. It is not publicly available how many migrants have names on the TSDB, but in March, Fox News reported that at least four migrants whose names match those on the terror watch list had been picked up by U.S. Border Patrol since the beginning of the fiscal year.

    Brnovich linked Scott’s statements to the Taliban’s freeing of thousands of prisoners – including terrorists – as they take control of Afghanistan ahead of the U.S. withdrawal at the end of the month.


    "These statements from a high-ranking Border Patrol official are frightening — especially as Americans are watching news coverage of thousands of prisoners, including many terrorists, being released by the Taliban in Afghanistan," he wrote to Biden. "Americans are now facing an unprecedented terrorism threat level in their own backyards."

    Brnovich urges Biden to visit the Arizona-Mexico border, which he says is the "front lines of this border catastrophe." More than 212,000 migrants were encountered in July, an increase from the already high numbers encountered in June.

    "We need to take decisive action to secure our border and prevent terrorists, gang members, and hardened criminals from accessing our ports of entry," he wrote.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]Video
    Meanwhile, Republicans on the House committees on Homeland Security, Armed Services and Foreign Affairs last week wrote to national security adviser Jake Sullivan about reports that thousands of prisoners – including Taliban fighters and al Qaeda and Islamic State members – had been released.

    "The rapidly deteriorating situation in Afghanistan suggests that the region may once-again return to being a terrorist safe-haven, serving to train foreign fighters while allowing terrorist groups to plot, direct and inspire attacks against the United States and the American people,’ the letter from Reps. John Katko, R-NY, Michael McCaul, R-Texas and Mike Rogers, R-Ala., said.

    In their letter, they also referenced the southern border as well as the Border Patrol chief’s comments, and expressed concern about an overwhelmed Border Patrol missing a terror threat.



    "While U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) plays a critical role in identifying and mitigating terrorist travel, the agency is currently strapped for resources as it manages the fallout from the administration’s disastrous border policies," they said.

    They requested information from the White House including how the U.S. is tracking released prisoners who may pose a threat, what steps are being taken to mitigate foreign travel by released prisoners and whether individuals are being added to the Terror Screening Database.
     
    1. stumbler
      Gee maybe Trump should not have surrendered to the Taliban and released 5,000 Taliban fighters from prison.
       
      stumbler, Sep 17, 2021
    2. CS natureboy
      Gee, maybe you should go suck Trump's dick someplace else.... The retard n chief biden is responsible for EVERYTHING that happens on his watch...:biggrin:
       
      CS natureboy, Sep 17, 2021
  4. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    81,996
    Wonder how psaki will spin this one?

    No, they aren't terrorists, theyre just high spirited boys?
     
  5. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    ....that hate the U.S. as much as we do.

    There I finished your sentence for you shooter.
     
  6. conroe4

    conroe4 Lake Lover In XNXX Heaven

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Messages:
    26,760
    Peppermint patti will just say. "Oh well, Boys will be Boys."

    She doesn't speak very well or convincingly. Par for the course on the biden boat.
     
  7. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    26,379
    'Remain in Mexico' SCOTUS ruling: Texas AG Paxton vows to hold Biden admin accountable after win
    Supreme Court reinstated Trump-era policy in response to a lawsuit from Texas and Missouri


    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Wednesday said his state would continue to hold the Biden administration accountable, a day after the Supreme Court reinstated the Trump-era "Remain in Mexico" policy in response to a lawsuit from Texas and Missouri.

    In a 6-3 decision, the court denied a request for a stay on a federal court ruling ordering the administration to reinstate the policy – formally called the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) – which keeps migrants in Mexico as they awaited their hearings.


    The policy, set up in 2019, was scrapped by the Biden administration as part of a sweep of moves to reverse Trump-era immigration policies. Texas and Missouri had sought (and eventually won) a preliminary injunction against the administration’s June 1 memo formally ending the policy — arguing that the ending of the policy was in breach of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).

    "It’s fundamentally important because we have a president who looked at federal law and said, ‘I don’t have to follow federal law, I’m the president, I do what I want, I don't care if it’s in statute, I don't care if Congress passed it, I can do what I want, I’m the president,’" Paxton told Fox News in an interview on Wednesday. "So it’s even bigger than immigration, it’s about the Constitution, the fact that even the president is supposed to follow the law."

    Republicans and Trump officials have argued that "Remain in Mexico," which resulted in court tents being set up along the border where migrants could briefly visit to have their cases heard before returning to Mexico, ended "catch-and-release" into the U.S. and therefore reduced the pull factors bringing migrants north.



    Critics of the program described it as cruel and one that put migrants in danger, while Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas called the policy ineffective. But a federal court in Texas found that the termination of MPP "has contributed to the current border surge" and that Department of Homeland Security counsel had conceded as much. The judge also noted the dramatic increase in border apprehensions since the policy was wound down and ruled that the reversal was arbitrary and capricious.

    Video
    Paxton said the policy had been very effective "in keeping people out of the country that were coming here, claiming asylum and disappearing into the country and never showing up again."

    DHS said in a statement on Tuesday that it will continue to appeal, but will "comply with the order in good faith."

    "Alongside interagency partners, DHS has begun to engage with the Government of Mexico in diplomatic discussions surrounding the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP)," the statement said.

    While Paxton said he was not confident that the Biden administration would willingly reinstate the policy, he said the ruling allows his office to seek to hold individual members of the administration who refuse to do so in contempt.

    "I don’t know whether they’re going to follow what a court says either, but if they don’t we’ll seek to hold them accountable," he said. "We’ll seek to take them back to court and whatever people are responsible for not following the law, we’ll ask for contempt and those people could end up in jail."



    He also said it was an important case for Texas in particular, given the damage the surge at the border was causing for the Lone Star State.

    "Clearly the Biden administration opened the borders up, said ‘come on in, bring your COVID, bring your fentanyl, let the cartels take over the border' and that's what's happening," he said. "I met with a bunch of ranchers from South Texas yesterday and they’re terrified, their land is being destroyed, they've had to move their cattle, they fear for their lives."

    The Supreme Court win comes a week after Texas and Louisiana secured another ruling from a federal judge that imposed a preliminary injunction on the Biden administration’s new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) guidelines that narrowed the categories of illegal immigrants being targeted for arrest and deportation.



    Paxton noted that the battle over immigration was just one of a number of legal battles his office is waging against the Biden administration, with other issues including Medicaid funding and the Keystone XL pipelines.

    "The Biden administration has decided they're going to make their own policies, their own rules and not follow what Congress has put in place and we’re going to continue that fight," he said
     
  8. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    26,379
    Biden Admin Releases 18K Unaccompanied Migrant Children into U.S. in August


    The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released more than 18,000 unaccompanied migrant children to sponsors within the United States in August 2021. Another 16,000 are still federally detained and await similar releases.

    During the month of August, HHS released an average of 605 unaccompanied migrant children to sponsors, against another 518 apprehended near border crossing points daily—creating little better than a wash on rolling detention totals.

    According to HHS, the numbers do not include children from Mexico. In most cases, those children are immediately returned.

    According to a source within CBP, many children, mostly teens, are sent into the United States by parents or other relatives to avoid expulsion under the Trump era CDC COVID-19 emergency order. Once the minor is in HHS care, the relative will enter the United States illegally and claim the child to begin the family re-unification process.

    The number of unaccompanied migrant children who entered the United States illegally this fiscal year is staggering. According to CBP, 113,791, were apprehended between October and July. This is a nearly 250 percent increase over 2020 totals.

    Health and Human Services opened more than a dozen emergency intake sites to deal with the influx of children. These facilities make use of vacant oilfield man camps and COVID-shuttered convention centers.

    Unlicensed facilities have faced criticism due to insufficient staffing, drinking water issues, and COVID-19 protections. Earlier this year, Texas Governor Greg Abbott sharply criticized the Biden Administration over conditions at multiple HHS detention facilities, specifically citing a water issue in Midland plus a COVID-19 outbreak in Carrizo Springs.

    HHS estimates the cost to detain a child is $775 per day. In other long-term facilities, they indicate that cost to be approximately $275 per day. Based on these estimates and the number of UACs currently in custody, the cost to the American taxpayer stands at more than $6 million daily.
     
  9. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    81,996
    When the government cannot secure our borders they have failed in their first and most important responsibility.
     
  10. latecomer91364

    latecomer91364 Easily Distracte

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    44,217
    Comedian Fuquan Johnson, Two Others, Dead After Apparent Drug Overdose, Model And Comedian Kate Quigley Expected To Recover

    It has come out - see article - that it was not really an overdose, but the cocaine was laced with Fentanyl - so it is a murder by 'open borders' Joe Biden - when does Hunter get ahold of some of this bad coke?

    Personally, and I know the Libtards and Schoolmarms will go crazy over this, but every Fentanyl death of a Biden supporter is a case of 'you got what you deserved'.

    https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/202...nd-comedian-kate-quigley-expected-to-recover/
     
  11. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    Republicans Raise Alarm on Vetting of Afghans After Man Convicted of Rape Allowed to Enter US

    Republican members of Congress are calling on President Joe Biden to detail the vetting process used by his administration to screen allies and others evacuated from Afghanistan after it was reported that a man—who had years earlier been convicted of rape and deported—made it to Dulles Airport before being apprehended.

    Rep. Yvette Herrell (R-N.M.) led over forty of her colleagues, including Chairman of the Republican Study Committee, Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) in sending a letter to Biden, asking him to provide details about the vetting process being used to screen the Afghans coming to the United States, particularly those on evacuation flights.

    “To be abundantly clear the United States should honor its promises to help Afghan nationals and their families who have risked their lives to support U.S. and Coalition forces, applied for the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) program, and are now fleeing the Taliban,” wrote the GOP House members. …

    Read More

    https://conservativevoicesusa.com/r...er-man-convicted-of-rape-allowed-to-enter-us/
     
  12. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    26,379
    Migrant encounters over 200,000 again in August, as border surge continues
    The 208,887 migrant encounters mark a 317% increase over last August
    [​IMG]

    There were more than 200,000 migrant encounters at the southern border in August, a DHS source told Fox News on Wednesday, the second month in a row where the number has been over the 200,000 mark as migrants continue to attempt to enter the U.S.

    The source told Fox that there were 208,887 encounters in August. While it marks the first decrease in migrant encounters seen under the Biden administration, where migrant encounters have been sharply rising for months, it is only a 2% drop over the more than 212,000 encounters in July
    Additionally, the 208,887 number for August represents a 317% increase over last August 2020 which saw 50,014 apprehensions — and a 233% increase over August 2019, where there were 62,707 apprehensions during that year's border crisis.

    Of those encounters, 49% were single adults, down 7% from July. Of the encounters, 44% were expelled via Title 42 public health protections put in place under the Trump administration and extended by the Biden administration.

    The Biden administration has been expelling single adults and some migrant families under the order, implemented due to COVID-19, but has not been expelling unaccompanied children or migrant families with young children.

    There were 18,847 encounters of unaccompanied children in August, down slightly from July, and 86.487 encounters of family units, marking a 4% increase over July.

    A CBP spokesperson told Fox News it does not provide preliminary data before the August data is posted to its website, which they said would be published in coming days.

    The Biden administration has faced fierce criticism for its handling of the crisis along the U.S.-Mexico border, which Republican critics have blamed on the dramatic rollback of Trump-era policies like border wall construction and the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP). It has also narrowed interior Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) priorities and pushed hard for legalization of illegal immigrants already in the country. It has also been releasing migrants into the interior, processing UACs to sponsors already in the country and releasing migrant families -- angering Republican governors and other lawmakers.

    The Biden administration has pushed back, blaming the Trump administration for sealing off legal pathways to asylum, while emphasizing the role that root causes -- like poverty, violence and corruption in Central America -- play in encouraging migrants to travel north.

    o
    DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said the administration intended to continue with its border strategy, which he said involves rebuilding "safe, legal and orderly pathways for migrants," improving processing, and going after smugglers.

    "We have a plan, we are executing our plan and that takes time," he said last month when he announced the July border numbers.

    He also told Border agents in audio leaked to Fox News that the situation is "unsustainable."

    "A couple of days ago I was down in Mexico, and I said look, you know, if, if our borders are the first line of defense, we're going to lose and this is unsustainable," Mayorkas said. "We can't continue like this, our people in the field can’t continue and our system isn't built for it."


    The administration was dealt a significant legal blow recently when the Supreme Court refused to delay an order forcing the Biden administration to re-implement the Migrant Protection Protocols -- a Trump-era policy that keeps migrants in Mexico as they await their hearing.

    DHS has said it is working on implementing that order in good faith, while a Border Patrol source in La Joya, Texas, told Fox News that they are now sending all families back to Mexico, unless they have a child under the age of 1, or if a migrant is pregnant.
     
  13. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    81,996
    Open borders.
    Told ya so.
     
  14. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    Oh my...more of the Crime Boss Biden and the Ho (half cracker 3.0) Administration implementing measure to protect the illegals over the real citizens of the U.S...

    FAA imposes no-fly zone zone for unmanned aircraft systems flying over Texas Bridge packed with more than 10,000 migrants

    Images captured by The Epoch Times this week showed thousands of illegal immigrants gathering under the Del Rio Bridge in South Texas as they waited to be processed by the Border Patrol.

    Val Verde County Sheriff Joe Frank Martinez confirmed that some 9,000 illegal immigrants, including Haitian, Cuban and Venezuelan nationals, were in the area.

    Following the release of the images, the FAA issued a notice on 16 September declaring a temporary flight ban to prevent all unmanned aircraft, such as drones, from flying over the area until 30 September for “special safety reasons”. citing was stopped.

    According to the notice, the Department of Defense (DOD), Homeland Security (DHS), and the Department of Justice (DOJ) can take action against anyone who does not comply with the temporary ban, including destroying an unmanned aircraft. . To post a credible security or security threat.

    The ban prohibits local and international media from capturing aerial footage and imagery showing the situation at the site. However, the official airspace exemption is granted, as well as those flying in the area on law enforcement and disaster assistance missions.

    https://nationworldnews.com/faa-imp...-bridge-packed-with-more-than-10000-migrants/

     
  15. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    81,996
    When we start allowing this kind of censorship and ignore the importance of securing our borders the end is not far in the future.
     
    1. BigSuzyB
      It’s an FAA thing not censorship. Epoch times. Geez and you cry wrongstory everyday.
      The end is nigh. You can’t fly a drone over crowds of people.
       
      BigSuzyB, Sep 17, 2021
      stumbler likes this.
    2. noboat
    3. conroe4
      I have a drone. Yes you can fly over crowds.
       
      conroe4, Sep 18, 2021
  16. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    81,996
    Absolutely!
    No drones flying over crowds!
    [​IMG]
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. noboat

    noboat Porn Star

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    14,169
  18. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    105,046
    The 10,000 or more refugees camping under the bridge in Texas are mostly Haitians fleeing violence, political upheaval, earthquakes, and climate change.
     
    1. shootersa
      And Joe has made them our problem, hasn't he?
      Told you a long time ago the despicable plan was open borders.
      They talk immigration reform, but their actions shout open borders.

      OH, and that reminds Shooter; HEY @stumbler you find that unrepresented kid in court yet?
       
      shootersa, Sep 17, 2021
  19. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    26,379
    Liar.... You don't know shit about the people under that bridge....

    What, do you have a crystal ball that provides you with the stupid nonsense you post?
     
    1. stumbler
      stumbler, Sep 18, 2021
      anon_de_plume likes this.
  20. BigSuzyB

    BigSuzyB Porn Star

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2015
    Messages:
    9,453
    Remote pilots finally have the ability to fly their drone over people and moving vehicles without a waiver. But this doesn’t mean you can fly over anyone, anywhere, anytime. So let’s break this down a bit, shall we?

    “No person may operate a small unmanned aircraft over a human being unless…” Those strong words are still part of 14 CFR § 107.39. However § 107.39(c) now lets you fly over people if your operation meets one of the “operational categories.”

    Subpart D of part 107 lists all the criteria a remote pilot needs to follow before they begin operating over people or moving vehicles. It does this by breaking down the operation into four categories, all based on the type of drone you’re flying.

    Before you fly your drone over people or moving vehicles, it’s very important that you become familiar with the operational categories and what you can and cannot do.

    Small drones may fit into Category 1 if they weigh 0.55 pounds or less, including everything on board or attached. Drones that weigh more than 0.55 pounds may operate as Category 2 or 3. However, these categories require additional testing by the manufacturer and FAA-approval prior to flying over people. Category 4 drones are issued an airworthiness certificate by the FAA.

    Each category has different requirements for when you’re flying over people. Some require remote ID, some must be listed on an FAA declaration of compliance, and some are limited to closed (or restricted) access sites. Before you fly over people, you’ll need to know which category your drone fits into. Learn more at the FAA’s website for Operations over People.
     
    • Like Like x 1