Yeah this is the guy you conservative/Republicans want leading the charge.

WATCH: MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell humiliated live on the air after being duped by Trump impersonator



During a 48-hour "FRANK-a-thon" event to promote the glitch-riddled launch of his new social media platform "FrankSpeech," MyPillow CEO and pro-Trump conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell took more than one phone call from pranksters.

Salon's Zachary Petrizzo shared two video showing Lindell fielding calls from pranksters. In one video, Lindell is led to believe that former president Donald Trump is calling in to the event.

"Well, we have the President here, our real president, everyone," Lindell says excitedly. "Hello, Mr. President."

But Lindell's excitement quickly turned sour as "the President" on the other line let out a stream of profanities, prompting Lindell to scramble to end the call.

Watch:

Zachary Petrizzo
@ZTPetrizzo
·
Apr 19, 2021
Things are only getting worse for MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell as he attempts to hold a 48 hours "FRANK-a-thon" event - as he is now being trolled by callers who apparently got ahold of his phone number.


Zachary Petrizzo
@ZTPetrizzo
Mike Lindell was just duped into thinking Trump was calling into the program.

11:20 AM · Apr 19, 2021

https://www.rawstory.com/mike-lindell-duped-trump-video/

 

Reports: Facebook gave $3M to Ariz. officials to boost ‘Democrat vote’

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 3:12 PM PT – Monday, April 19, 2021
Election officials in Arizona are suspected of accepting large sums of money from Facebook just ahead of the 2020 election.

“Center for Tech and Civic Life or CTCL, funded by Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg, is dark, refusing to disclose its donors,” said Scott Walter, president of the Capital Research Center. “We’ve studied the data for Arizona and seven more states, highlights are in my written testimony, but the pattern is simple. It’s more likely to find heavily Democratic jurisdictions and do so disproportionately.”

Arizona state lawmakers found Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook gave $3 million to Maricopa County election officials, allegedly to flip it blue in the 2020 election.

Experts warned left-leaning tech giants are seeking to privatize U.S. elections.

“Everywhere you did have greater turnout in this election versus the 2016 election, but listen to these simple numbers. In the counties that were funded, the Republican votes increased 46 percent more than they increased in the unfunded counties,” Walter explained. “On the Democrat side, the counties that were funded saw an 81 percent better vote increase than the ones that were not funded.”

Analysts found dark money from Facebook and other tech giants could be used to buy votes for Democrat candidates, and such funding violates U.S. federal law.

Arizona lawmakers are now pushing to investigate such activity.

 

Moms for America poised to declare independence from Big Tech by July 4
https://www.oann.com/moms-for-america-poised-to-declare-independence-from-big-tech-by-july-4/
OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 10:00 AM PT – Tuesday, April 20, 2021
Moms for America is poised to declare independence from Big Tech starting July 4. Moms for America spokesperson Cindy Chafian said that the organization is leaving the platforms due to bullying and censorship by Big Tech.

One America’s John Hines spoke to Chafian and has more on this report from Washington.

 

Mike Lindell’s New Social Media Platform Attacked After Launch

Mike Lindell, the CEO of MyPillow and an ardent fan of former President Donald Trump, spent months developing a new social media platform after he was banned from Twitter due to his constant tweets regarding bogus claims of voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election. He planned for his new site to launch Monday, and it didn't have a smooth rollout.

Frank is Lindell's social media platform, which was intended to go live Monday morning, but so far has consisted of him live streaming more misinformation about voter fraud. Earlier in the day, the site went down multiple times, which Lindell claimed was a "massive attack." He also contended with multiple prank callers, including one who pretended to be Trump.

Lindell did release a bit of news Monday morning with the launch of Frank. He said he filed a $1.6 billion lawsuit against Dominion Voting Systems for "suppression of speech and attacks on the company." This comes two months after the company sued him for the same amount for voter fraud claims.

Frank, according to Lindell, was to consist of features similar to YouTube and Twitter. There was an initial VIP launch on Thursday, but that was delayed. Lindell says he has conservative pundits planning content for Frank and offered bonuses to banned YouTube creators who develop content for his platform.

 

More censorship measures are being practiced by Big Tech, so I suspect there will be more legal ramifications set forward.

It may appear that big tech is manipulating our entire system.

Daily Mail owner sues Google for monopoly over ad business

The Daily Mail, owner of the MailOnline newspaper, sued Google on Tuesday, alleging that the search and advertising giant’s power over selling online ad space means newspapers see little of the revenue their content produces.

The federal lawsuit against Google and its parent, Alphabet Inc (GOOGL.O), alleges that Google controls the tools used to sell ad inventory as well as the space on publishers' pages where ads can be placed and the exchange that decides where ads will be placed.

"The lack of competition for publishers’ inventory depresses prices and reduces the amount and quality of news available to readers, but Google ends up ahead because it controls a growing share of the ad space that remains," the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit, which was filed in U.S. District Court in New York by the British-based company, also said that Google "punished" publishers who "do not submit to its practices."

Google called the lawsuit's claims "meritless" and "inaccurate."

"The use of our ad tech tools has no bearing on how a publisher's website ranks in Google Search," Google said in a statement that said publishers had many options to sell ad space. "The Daily Mail itself authorizes dozens of ad tech companies to sell and manage their ad space, including Amazon, Verizon and more."

Google faces similar allegations in a lawsuit filed by Texas and a group of other states in December. That lawsuit is one of a series filed against Google and Facebook Inc (FB.O) late last year.

A bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers led by Senator Amy Klobuchar and Representative David Cicilline introduced legislation in March aimed at making it easier for news organizations to negotiate collectively with platforms like Google and Facebook in hopes of boosting revenues.

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are Associated Newspapers Ltd and Mail Media Inc, which publish MailOnline.

 

It may appear that big tech is manipulating our entire system.

Wait. This is news to anyone?

 

Internal Report Finds Facebook Failed to Curb ‘Stop the Steal’ Juggernaut

https://www.thedailybeast.com/new-i...steal-movement-ahead-of-capitol-riot?ref=home

 

If anything needs to be censored its hateful dumb ass comments made by stupid forum members who cant control themselves...like in the solimani thread

 

Tech experts explain why Mike Lindell's botched social site was doomed to fail

Zachary Petrizzo, Salon
April 23, 2021



Frankspeech.com/screen grab


MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell's social media site FRANK is facing ridicule from the community of "grandmasters" around the content management software Drupal, who say Lindell's site was destined to fail from the start because his developers failed to take "elementary" coding steps to limit attacks from outside forces. Since its supposed "VIP launch" last Thursday night, Lindell's platform has experienced numerous crashes, and at this writing on Thursday evening the site remains down.

https://www.rawstory.com/my-pillow-frank/

 

This is too funny!



Thinskin

 

Facebook's internal report on its role in Trump's insurrection has now been leaked online: report


Bob Brigham
April 26, 2021



Facebook CEO and chairman Mark Zuckerberg, seen at a 2016 APEC summit in Peru, is likely to be grilled over privacy issues in two congressional hearings AFP/File / Rodrigo BUENDIA


An internal Facebook report on the social media company's role in enabling the January 6th insurrection has been posted in full online.

"Last Thursday, BuzzFeed News revealed that an internal Facebook report concluded that the company had failed to prevent the "Stop the Steal" movement from using its platform to subvert the election, encourage violence, and help incite the Jan. 6 attempted coup on the US Capitol," BuzzFeed News reported Monday.

"Titled "Stop the Steal and Patriot Party: The Growth and Mitigation of an Adversarial Harmful Movement," the report is one of the most important analyses of how the insurrectionist effort to overturn a free and fair US presidential election spread across the world's largest social network — and how Facebook missed critical warning signs. The report examines how the company was caught flat-footed as the Stop the Steal Facebook group supercharged a movement to undermine democracy, and concludes the company was unprepared to stop people from spreading hate and incitement to violence on its platform," BuzzFeed reported. "The report's authors, who were part of an internal task force studying harmful networks, published the document to Facebook's internal message board last month, making it broadly available to company employees. But after BuzzFeed News revealed the report's existence last week, many employees were restricted from accessing it."

Buzzfeed published the report in full, due to the "newsworthiness and historical significance of the report and it's revelations."

"Hindsight is 20/20, at the time it was very difficult to know whether what we were seeing was a coordinated effort to delegitimize the election, or whether it was protected free expression by users who were afraid and confused and deserved our empathy. But hindsight being 20/20 makes it all the more important to look back to learn what we can about the growth of the election delegitimizing movements that grew, spread conspiracy, and helped incite the Capitol Insurrection," the report explained. "The first Stop the Steal Group emerged on election night. It was flagged for escalation because it contained high levels of hate and violence and incitement (VNI) in the comments. The Group was disabled, and an investigation was kicked off, looking for early signs of coordination and harm across the new Stop the Steal Groups that were quickly sprouting up to replace it. With our early signals, it was unclear that coordination was taking place, or that there was enough harm to constitute designating the term. It wasn't until later that it became clear just how much of a focal point the catchphrase would be, and that they would serve as a rallying point around which a movement of violent election delegitimization could coalesce."

The report named names.

"The terms Stop the Steal and Patriot Party were amplified both on platform and off. Ali Alexander and the Kremer sisters repeated slogans at rallies, and spread them through super Groups like Women4Trump and Latinos for Trump. The Kremer Sisters were admins of both Women4Trump, and the original Stop the Steal Group. After January 6th, Amy Kremer confirmed on platform that she was an organizer for the Stop the Steal rally that precipitated the Capitol Insurrection," the report noted. "Ali Alexander worked on and off platform, using media appearances and celebrity endorsements. We also observed him formally organizing with others to spread the term, including with other users who had ties to militias. He was able to elude detection and enforcement with careful selection of words, and by relying on disappearing stories."

https://www.rawstory.com/facebook-insurrection/

 

It's a pity that these tech giants don't choose to do something good with all there media related power, like "guide" the elections in African countries so the actual black lives that matter get real guidance and governance not just lies and looting.

 

GOP's Josh Hawley brutally mocked for using Amazon to sell his anti-big tech book: 'Your blatant grifting is such an embarrassment'


Josh Hawley, R- Mo., asks questions during a Senate Homeland Security& Governmental Affairs Committee hearing to discuss election security and the 2020 election process on Dec. 16. - Nash Greg/TNS

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) on Tuesday hyped the release of his book called "The Tyranny of Big Tech" by posting a link to its Amazon page.

https://www.rawstory.com/josh-hawley-2652795611/

 

Conservative/Republicans like to talk about taking on "Big Tech" but Biden/Harris are actually doing it.

Biden wants local governments to provide broadband internet. Could they compete with Comcast and Verizon?

The rural borough of Kutztown, Pa., couldn't convince companies to bring faster internet to its community. So the town, about 70 miles northwest of Philadelphia, built its own broadband network.

Since 2000, Kutztown's 5,000 residents can buy internet service from a municipal entity, just like the water and electricity they purchase from borough utilities. The publicly-owned, fiber optic network has not only provided improved download speeds, but has also lowered prices, the town says. A private company has since slashed its rates to compete, it adds.

"Whether you subscribe to the service or not, you're still benefiting from its existence," said Mark Arnold, the borough's telecommunications director.

President Joe Biden's $2 trillion infrastructure plan aims to expand internet access by building more such community broadband networks. The Biden administration has called broadband "the new electricity," noting the federal government worked to bring power to nearly every home under President Franklin Roosevelt because it was crucial to the economy.

Biden's internet proposal would override 19 state laws that restrict municipalities from competing with private providers, including a law in Pennsylvania that passed after Kutztown already built its network.


https://www.nationalmemo.co...

 

^^^
This has nothing to do with the Big Tech censorship issue.

Another attempt by a lying Libtard to blow smoke up your ass.

I would almost say 'good try', but it wasn't. It was just pathetic.

 

Republicans were stopped from taking on "Big Tech", by democrats who benefited from big tech shutting down the Republican message to get Biden elected

 

And now they're blatantly using big tech to sell their pig bill.

Political payback.

 

Twitter Removes 'Uncle Tim' from Trending Topics After Senator Scott Attacked Over Biden Rebuttal Speech

 

Who exactly, does the Crime Boss Biden and the Ho (half cracker 3.0) Administration owe for the fraudulent election win that Crime Boss Biden and the Ho (half cracker 3.0) Administration has benefited from, which private companies does Crime Boss Biden and the Ho (half cracker 3.0) Administration owe?...just as the Crime Boss Biden and the Ho (half cracker 3.0) Administration is restricting State Rights.

 

Judicial Watch: Records Show Iowa State Officials Coordinated with Big Tech to Censor Election Posts

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch announced today that it received 624 pages of records from the office of the Secretary of State of Iowa, revealing how state officials pressured social media companies (Twitter and Facebook) to censor posts about the 2020 election. Included in these records were emails from Iowa state officials to representatives of Big Tech pressuring these companies to remove Judicial Watch’s posts. The emails show how the state agency successfully pressured Facebook to censor Judicial Watch’s post about Iowa’s management of its voter rolls.

Judicial Watch received the records as a result of a June 2020 Iowa Open Records lawsuit that was filed after the Iowa Secretary of State failed to comply with a February 2020 request for records and communications about a Judicial Watch report regarding the accuracy of the state’s voter registration rolls (Judicial Watch v. Iowa Secretary of State (No. 05771 EQCE085973)). Judicial Watch was represented by Iowa lawyer Alan R. Ostergren of Des Moines, Iowa.

The records show that officials in the Iowa Secretary of State office on multiple occasions contacted officials from Facebook and Twitter to try to have these companies remove Judicial Watch posts that raised concerns about Iowa’s failure to maintain accurate election rolls.

On February 3, 2020, at 5:19 p.m., Kevin Hall, the communications director for the Iowa Secretary of State, wrote in a February 3, 2020, email to Facebook official Rachel Holland:

Rachel,

We’ve been playing whack-a-mole with this false story all day. Is there anything you can do to help: [likely https://www.facebook.com/JudicialWatch/posts/10157583458431943]

We’ve told them is fake. They have it PINNED to the top of their page.

Here’s our rebuttal: https://sos.iowa.gov/news/2020_02_02.html

Holland responded at 6:11p.m., writing:

Hi Kevin,

Circling back with an update regarding the content posted by Judicial Watch. Our third-party fact checkers have rated this content false, and we have applied a filter over the content warning users before they click to see it that the content has been rated false by independent fact checkers.

Please continue to report violating content to us by emailing [email protected], and copying me ([email protected]), as I will be on an airplane for the next couple hours. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding this or any other matters.

A couple of hours later, Hall followed up, “Thank you! They have new posts up, doubling down on the false claims.”

And Holland responded, “Thanks for flagging- we’ve got a full team with eyes on this now and are applying the false filter to similar articles as well. I’ll send you an additional update shortly!”

That same day, Hall and Maria Benson, the director of communications at the National Association of Secretaries of State, both tried to convince Twitter to censor Judicial Watch’s posts but were ultimately unsuccessful.

Hall filed a report with Twitter, and Benson escalated it by looping in Kevin Kane from Twitter. On February 3, 2020, Benson wrote, “Iowa Secretary of State has reported the below election misinformation, but Twitter has declined to take it down. As you can see from facts the tweets are clearly wrong. I wanted to bring this to your attention to hopefully remedy the situation. I’ve cc’d Kevin Hall, their Communicators Director.”

Kane responded rejecting the request saying, “Thanks Maria – This was reviewed by our team and is not in violation of our election integrity policy as it does not suppress voter turnout or mislead people about when. where. or how to vote. I understand this is not the outcome you are seeking and appreciate you continuing to report Tweets to our team.”

In an email the next day, Hall wrote to Kane saying, “Facebook, thankfully, was helpful. I would suggest perhaps reviewing your policies at Twitter and putting them more in line with what Facebook is doing to counter election misinformation.”

After being rejected by Twitter, Benson emailed Brian Scully, an official at the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, writing on February 3, 2020:

Hey Brian,

Can you report this as well? Hannity is now retweeting and Twitter isn’t playing ball with us. I’ve cc’d Kevin Hall who you met Saturday. He’s IA SOS’s Communications Director. He’s been reporting and playing wack a mole by trying to reply to misleading tweets.

Scully responded promising to contact Twitter. “Sorry … been out of pocket a bit. Will reach out to Twitter. Let me know if you get something.”

“These records are yet another example of state officials conspiring with Big Tech to deny Americans their First Amendment rights,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These records further show that Big Tech censorship is a government scandal: Iowa government officials worked with Facebook to remove posts they didn’t like, and Facebook bowed to this political pressure immediately. It should be disturbing to all Americans that government officials are working to censor speech they disagree with and that these behemoth companies often seem willing to roll over and censor free speech.”

Judicial Watch last week released records from the office of the Secretary of State of California revealing how state officials pressured social media companies (Twitter, Facebook, Google (YouTube)) to censor posts about the 2020 election. Included in these records were “misinformation briefings” emails that were compiled by communications firm SKDK, that lists Biden for President as their top client of 2020. The records show how the state agency successfully pressured YouTube to censor a Judicial Watch video concerning the vote by mail and a Judicial Watch lawsuit settlement about California voter roll clean up.