Ooh! There's another completely inconsequential Meme that says nothing except that the poster is an idiot who has no intelligent argument.

LOL - we're certainly expecting too much if we're anticipating any kind of intelligent argument from this dumbfuck (which, we are not).

 

We are.

We do, but that's not what's happening today is it?

Half cracker has meeting's with big tech, which suggests that federal fucking Government got heavily involved in the private sector, as Googlemotherfucker starting implementing algorithms that place the opposing voices further back in the search engines, (a rather slickery move), then finding a loophole that allows the private sector media platforms to utilize their exclusive power to stifle opposing opinions with grace.

No one actually gives or lends any credibility to much of what you have to say...as all of your bullshit gets debunked on an hourly basis, just as this misconception has been

You and your fellow yo-yo leftists can cherish half crackers full on assault of the American fundamentals of this Nation as established all you want.

The entire world has been trying it for over 230 years, while also having help from the very non patriotic domestic hack fucks like yourself.

This Nation was born upon a very strong Constitutional foundation...it's gonna take more than the likes of you and half cracker to make this Nation crumble to it knees..hack fuck

 

Trump has you full on fucked up in the head...doesn't he?

It's ok, you can admit it, cuz we all know he does.

 

I personally don't like censoring/banning content of any kind from anywhere, no matter what the message being sent. I get that people who own things are entitled to do whatever they like with them, as well as set the standards and policies for what they own, but it's a slippery slope when we start deciding who's allowed to speak and what they say.

 

Facebook is a privately held corporation that is not required to allow everyone access to their platform. They don't even have to play fair.

 

ThatThere was absolutely nothing about this on the NRSC website not their Facebook page.

Fake news? It is OANN!

 

When the New York Times published details from Trumps tax records that were obtained illegally Shooter noted that their facebook pages carried the entire story. Facebook had not a word to say about it.

When Hunter Bidens laptop surfaced Facebook censored any mention of its contents on the basis that "hacked" information would not be allowed on Facebook.

First, Trumps tax returns were in fact obtained illegally.
Second, the information on Bidens laptop was not illegal or hacked, he had abandoned it and it was a case of finders keepers.

A clear case of censorship based on politics.

And that way lies the ultimate failure of Democracy.

 

Shooter is not surprised at anything a crackhead would do.

The point was that Facebook censors based on politics.
And that should bother even you.

 

Conservatives respond to Twitter’s ban on the President

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 12:50 PM PT – Saturday, January 9, 2021
Conservative lawmakers are slamming Twitter for deleting President Trump’s account, citing Big Tech censorship.

The social media giant banned the President’s personal account on Friday to prevent “inciting further violence” following the attack on Capitol Hill. However, his official ‘POTUS’ account remains active although several of its tweets were deleted this week. Moderate to conservative voices were quick to denounce the move as censorship.

Former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley compared it to the oppression of citizens in communist China. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) said the ban will “only divide us further.”

The President’s son, Don Jr. — who himself has faced threats of censorship from Twitter — referenced the dystopian reality of the novel “1984” by George Orwell. He also noted Big Tech killed free speech in America.

Other lawmakers pointed to Twitter’s hypocrisy as it allows the account of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to keep running, despite terrorism threats towards the U.S.

Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.) pointed to ”anti-American” tweets also from the Chinese Communist Party. Even Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), whose waning support for the President has become noticed by conservatives, called the decision a “mistake.”

Conservatives said Twitter has lost any respect it had for free speech. They noted the Big Tech giant is pushing Democrat agendas by silencing conservatives who speak out.


In the meantime, Facebook and Instagram have placed temporary bans on the President’s accounts until the end of his term. Snapchat and Twitch have suspended the President’s access to his accounts, as well.

 

Big tech to ban Parler over lack of content moderation

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 6:57 AM PT – Saturday, January 9, 2021
A social networking service known as Parler is facing immense pressure from big tech companies to strengthen its content moderation policies.

On Friday, Google and Apple both suspended Parler from their app stores, claiming some of the political posts on the platform incite violence and need to be regulated. A spokesperson for Google said the suspension will remain in place until developers submit a detailed content moderation plan and address what he called a “public safety threat.”

The company noted that the measure will not impact Parler’s availability on the web, nor will it remove the app from the devices of existing users.

Meanwhile, Apple has taken a more aggressive approach, giving Parler 24 hours to improve its content moderation or be removed indefinitely from the app store.



Though founded in 2018, Parler recently made a name for itself as the social media alternative for those who have been banned from or silenced on the major social media sites like Twitter and Facebook.




Some noteworthy users include Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who turned to the platform earlier this year after their voices were largely silenced elsewhere.

In the midst of the recent ban, many agree Silicon Valley has gone too far.

“We can’t just revoke someone’s voice because we don’t agree with what they say,” University of Buffalo Professor Monica Stephens said.

Despite the threats, Parler CEO John Matze is standing his ground, assuring he will not comply with Apple and Google’s demands. He went on to accuse the companies of applying standards to Parler that they don’t apply to their own services.

He added that America “already lost if speech has to be restricted or censored in order to keep the country safe.”

 

Mexico President condemns censorship of President Trump

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 6:15 PM PT – Saturday, January 9, 2021
Mexico’s president criticizes the social media censorship of President Trump.

President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador slammed the blocking of President Trump online. He noted everyone has the right to free speech on social media.

“One thing that I didn’t like yesterday with the incident at the Capitol is that I don’t like censorship,” Obrador said. “I don’t like anyone to be censored and for them to have their right taken away to send a message on Twitter or on Facebook.”


SAN ANSELMO, CALIFORNIA – JANUARY 08: The suspended Twitter account of U.S. President Donald Trump appears on a laptop screen on January 08, 2021 in San Anselmo, California. Citing the risk of further incitement of violence following an attempted insurrection on Wednesday, Twitter permanently suspended President Donald Trump’s account. (Photo Illustration by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

He went on to call the violence at the Capitol this week “unfortunate,” but said it is important Mexico doesn’t take a position.


This illustration photo shows a mobile phone placed on a US flag with Tweets from US President Donald Trump masked with warnings imposed by Twitter stating that they may be incorrect, November 5, 2020 as vote counting continues to determine the winner of the presidential election (Photo by ROBYN BECK/AFP via Getty Images)

He also said he hopes democracy prevails.

 

Isn't Parler hillbilly online?

Thinskin

 

Big Tech under more fire for removing President Trump’s accounts

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 7:04 PM PT – Sunday, January 10, 2021
Supporters and non-supporters of President Trump are speaking out against Big Tech’s far-reaching ability to censor people.

“Facebook, Twitter, they all took down the President’s accounts,” Mike Lindell, CEO of MyPillow said. “They took down Sydney Powell’s. They took down General Flynn’s, all my friends are out there. So many that are in the media, they took down theirs. They took them all. We had all social platforms so they’re not going to be able to get these messages out there, and it’s their livelihood. This is the danger we’re in right now.”

A lawyer for the ACLU condemned social media companies, namely Facebook and Twitter, for the move, saying it’s concerning that these companies wield the unchecked power to remove people from their platforms that have become indispensable for the speech of billions.

Former Fox News host Megyn Kelly, who’s been an outspoken critic of the President, questioned the move. She claimed it targets people on the right or those who are not woke.

In a series of tweets, Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny called Twitter’s decision “unacceptable.” He believes officials based the decision off of emotion and political preference.

Navalny blasted the social media company for letting unknown people ban accounts by a process the public is unaware of.








“Don’t tell me he was banned for violating Twitter rules,” Navalny said. “I get death threats here every day for many years and Twitter doesn’t ban anyone.”

The Russian opposition leader, who was poisoned late last year, is calling for Twitter to create a committee that can make such decisions.

 

Censorship by any other name is still censorship, liberals will use this to curtail Republican/ Conservative opinion...feracan is still allows to post hate and plenty of other liberal hate groups are still active...FB, Twiter made there choice

 

Hold on now...I'm sure this is all just some major misunderstanding and a coincidence...

 

Shooter hasn't looked, but one report he saw said the Iranian government has accounts on both Twitter and Facebook, and have called for "Death to Americans" and attacked President Trump, without so much as a warning from Facebook or Twitter.

It is correct that the Constitution generally does not allow censorship and protects free speech, and that it applies to government actions only.

But, the Supreme court has extended that protection to cover Westbboro Baptist Church hateful protests at military funerals.

And, fair warning, the Supreme Court said the protection pretty much extends to public employees, so those Seattle cops who were in DC have an excellent legal action against the city, assuming they did not break any laws. They said they did not enter the capital, and there's no evidence they did. but they have been suspended pending investigation anyway.

The court has also said that most internet traffic is also protected, provided that the message is not a clear threat to the President, incites violence (but a website listing home addresses and personal information of abortion doctors attributed to at least two murders was protected - go figure), reveals intellectual property, or supports terrorist organizations.

But here's the thing. Any censorship, especially censorship because the message is unpopular, should be opposed by citizens no matter who the message comes from, and no matter if it's in a newspaper, church bulletin, social media website, or the nutcase standing on a soap box in the town square.

 

It has been said that social media platforms have deleted/suspended (or whatever the fuck say) extended to Iran

Especially this one:

Facebook caught Iranian trolls spreading pro-Trump propaganda online

In a blog post Wednesday, Facebook announced it had taken down dozens of Instagram and Facebook accounts that engaged in foreign interference, including separate campaigns from Russia, Myanmar, Vietnam, and Iran.

The Iranian campaign was apparently focused on winning over Trump-supporting evangelicals in the US. The posts shared by the fake accounts were “news” items about US elections, Christianity, US immigration policy, and US-Iran relations, and included images of President Trump, according to Facebook’s blog post.

Some of the accounts attempted to contact public figures, posted in groups, and commented on other Facebook content, Facebook said. The operation was connected to an Iran-based global network of hundreds of accounts that it removed in January 2019. “We are making progress rooting out this abuse, but as we’ve said before, it’s an ongoing challenge,” Facebook’s head of security policy Nathaniel Gleicher wrote in the blog post.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I can not believe how many political subjects are of the opinion that social media is in fact America, and speaks for the U.S. and policy... it's held high as a political arm.

 

Don't you mean that America is waking up from a nightmare now that the orange idiot has almost imploded and nearly gone, stamping his childish feet on the way out. I WONT go to the Inauguration, I WON'T, I WON'T.....