Internet uses Fox News HR docs to fact-check Tucker Carlson's accusation Biden 'lied' about vaccine mandate

Sarah K. Burris
October 11, 2021



Tucker Carlson Screen Capture
Fox News host Tucker Carlson said on his Monday show that accusations that Fox News is mandating vaccines are untrue and that President Joe Biden lied when he claimed as much.

Last week, Biden mocked hosts at the network who were raging against the COVID-19 vaccine while their company is owned by a pro-vaccine Rupert Murdoch and 90 percent of the company has been vaccinated.

But Carlson claimed that there is no vaccine mandate, but he left out quite a few facts. For example, Fox News says that you don't have to get vaccinated if you agree to submit to daily coronavirus testing. The company also has an online vaccine passport system. Carlson conveniently left the information out, not giving his viewers the full truth.

The host claimed that he and his team would "know" because they actually worked there. The problem with the argument that some indicated online is that Fox News' HR memo has been leaked online. So, viewers can read exactly what the network is mandating.

Kevin Lord, the senior vice president at Fox said in a statement, "Following our request for employees to upload their vaccination status in our secure system, we are pleased to share that more than 90 percent of our full-time employees reported that they are fully vaccinated."

Carlson is also still refusing to say whether or not he personally is vaccinated. So, while he's pushing viewers to be skeptical of the shot and any mask mandates, an overwhelming majority of Fox is vaccinated and wears masks, possibly even Carlson himself.

You can see the comments from fact-checkers below:

Acyn
@Acyn
·
Oct 11, 2021
lol


Fin FoxGuy - Moderna Vaxx'd & Voting Blue
@FinFox2
Well damn. Here it is from Fox HR.

7:00 PM · Oct 11, 2021

Ron W
@FIPmyWHIP
·
Oct 11, 2021
Replying to @Acyn



Dave in Santa Clarita
@urquelldude
Looks like Tucker and the Chyron were lying. I'm not shocked.

https://www.rawstory.com/tucker-carlson-lies-fox-news-lmandate/

 

HUNTER BIDEN HUNTER BIDEN HUNTER BIDEN!!!!!

Oh wait .....


Alleged Tucker Carlson Email Thanking Hunter Biden For Helping His Son Leaked: ‘I Can’t Thank You Enough’
By Alex GriffingDec 3rd, 2021, 12:01 am
2017 comments



Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Pro-Trump conspiracy theorist Lin Wood posted a screenshot on the messaging platform Telegram purporting to be a 2014 email exchange between Hunter Biden and Tucker Carlson.

Posted by Wood on Thursday, the alleged email, whose authenticity has not been verified, appears to show Carlson thanking Biden for writing a letter of recommendation to Georgetown University for his son.

“Hunter! I can’t thank you enough for writing that letter to Georgetown on Buckley’s behalf. So nice of you. I know it’ll help,” read the screenshot of the purported November 12, 2014 Carlson email to Biden. “Hope you’re great and we can all get dinner soon.”



According to the screenshot (which Mediaite is not linking to because it may display active email addresses for Biden and Carlson), Biden is said to have replied, “Hey buddy- I need Buckley’s CV if you have one handy- Thanks[.]”

“Of course,” came the response. “Getting on a plane now but I’ll ask Susie to send it right away. Thanks again. It’s really nice of you to do this.”

Hunter Biden, the controversial son of President Joe Biden, had been a favorite target of Carlson and right-wing commentators leading up to and after the 2020 presidential election.

Author and journalist Mike Rothschild wrote of Wood’s recent posts on Telegram:

Want to clarify one quick thing: Lin Wood has 100% posted conspiracy theories and hoaxes about the 2020 election. But all the calls and documents he’s posted during his recent rampage against Tuck, Flynn, Byrne, etc, have held up to scrutiny.

Rothschild also noted the timeline surrounding the purported email exchange:

Doing a little digging to see if this holds up to established facts – the timing for Buckley Carlson applying for colleges fits since he was born in 1997. And Tuck was just a weekend Fox and Friends guy in 2014, not the infotainment conspiracy machine he is now.

While rumors of a previous friendship between Biden and Carlson riled up political commentators and pundits on Twitter, the Fox News host has acknowledged on his show that he knew Biden.

In an October 2020 segment, Carlson said, “Hunter Biden is a fallen man” who he “knew fairly well”:

There are a lot of documents about Hunter Biden’s personal life that we haven’t brought you and that we’re not going to bring you, and we should tell you why,” Carlson said. “One is the obvious answer: He’s not running for president. Hunter Biden is a fallen man at this point. I should also say that I knew Hunter Biden fairly well. We lived near each other in Washington for quite some time. I knew his wife, who’s an absolutely outstanding person, a good person.

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/a...biden-i-cant-thank-you-enough-so-nice-of-you/

 

Who the fuck would want a reference from such as Hunter Biden?

 

Kay. Now that's funny, @Username 1 . No matter who you are.

 

Yeah you can do about anything you want on Fox except run afoul of the Jewish lobby. What Logan said was beyond just outrageous. It was also stupid and ignorant to think she could get away with it.

Fox News Disappears Lara Logan From the Air Following Fauci Attack
By Caleb HoweDec 4th, 2021, 1:20 pm
307 comments




Following her comments about Dr. Anthony Fauci during a Fox News appearance on Monday, Lara Logan has been noticeably absent from the airwaves this week, having made zero appearances since.

“Has Lara Logan been quietly benched by Fox News? All indications are yes,” CNN’s Oliver Darcy pointed out in the Reliable Sources newsletter. “Fox isn’t commenting on the matter, but prior to that Monday appearance, Logan was a mainstay on the network. Now she has disappeared.”

Darcy may have a point. Looking into some immediately prior appearances, we found that for the week of November 21 to 27, Logan was on that Sunday on Fox & Friends, and that Friday on The Faulkner Focus. That week the network also aired the Fox Nation “Patriot Awards” show, where Logan was a presenter.

The previous week, Logan was on with Trey Gowdy, Sean Hannity, Fox & Friends, Fox News Primetime, The Five, and America’s Newsroom with Bill Hemmer and Dana Bash, where she spoke with Sandra Smith about terror and promoted her special on Fox Nation. So she regularly appears both on the network’s opinion shows and the dayside news programs.

While Lara Logan is neither a contributor nor host on Fox News Channel, like many Fox Nation personalities she is on the network a lot. Or rather, she usually is. She wasn’t in the days following the Mengele comments.

One week isn’t enough to establish a pattern, but Darcy is not wrong that her absence since Monday was conspicuous.

Darcy added that “a hush-hush period in the penalty box is not sufficient” and that Fox News should issue a statement, however the network has not done so at this time.

She may be off the air at Fox News, but Logan has continued commentary on Twitter about Dr. Fauci, including retweeting or liking a slew of tweets bashing him as a Nazi or worse. She has also blocked the Auschwitz Memorial after the organization condemned her comments. She blocked the Auschwitz Memorial on Twitter, I’d like to repeat.

https://www.mediaite.com/news/fox-news-disappears-lara-logan-from-the-air-following-fauci-attack/

 

Trump admits to obstruction of justice in Fox News interview





President Donald Trump shakes James Comey's hand (Photo: Screen capture)



Former President Donald Trump bragged that he effectively obstructed justice during a Fox News interview.

Amid demands for Attorney General Merrick Garland to impanel a grand jury, Trump told Fox News that he simply had to fire former FBI Director James Comey. Otherwise, he could have been held accountable for his relationship with Russia during the 2016 election.

"Don't forget, I fired Comey," Trump bragged. "Had I not fired Comey, you might not be talking to me right now about a beautiful book about four years in the White House, and we'll see about the future. If I didn't fire Comey, they were looking to take down the president of the United States… I don't think I could've survived if I didn't fire him."

The report published by former special counsel Robert Mueller said that they didn't even look at whether Trump broke the law during the 2016 election because he followed the Office of Legal Counsel's opinion that the president couldn't be indicted while in office. What Mueller did say was that he uncovered at least 10 examples of obstruction of justice from Trump attempting to stop his investigation.

In the video below, Trump admits that firing Comey was one of those examples:


https://www.rawstory.com/trump-bstruction-of-justice-comey/

 

We actually see Russian propaganda posted on this forum all the time. Anytime you see OAN you are looking at a Russian asset. But it doesn't stop there. Most right wing media push Russian false propaganda and have been ever since Putin helped steal the election for Trump.


Joe Scarborough Calls Out Fox News for Delivering ‘Talking Points of Vladimir Putin’
By Colby HallDec 8th, 2021, 8:33 am
827 comments


Joe Scarborough made a point to not name any names, but he clearly called out Fox News coverage of Tuesday’s call between President Joe Biden and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin.

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman joined the set of Morning Joe to assess the secure call between the two, and provide the expertise that only a former Director for European Affairs for the United States National Security Council can.

Vindman said that Putin is looking to exploit any opportunity to regain some sphere of control in Ukraine, “An opportunity is perceived weakness in the United States.” He then clarified that the opportunity “Really doesn’t have that much to do with Joe Biden. He’s testing Joe Biden to see if President Biden is actually going to stick to his guns and be firm and resolved and pushing back on Russian aggression.”

He continued to note that Putin is looking at the “underlying conditions,” at the current state of American politics. “He’s looking at insurrection. If we didn’t have an insurrection on January 6th this past year, I don’t think Vladimir Putin would see the same opportunities and same kind of weakness. He sees gaps between the US and Europe.”

“I’m not going to name any names, you know, but there is a cable news channel that supports Vladimir Putin, that has become… delivers the talking points of Vladimir Putin,” Scarborough followed, making clear reference to Fox News. “That’s exactly right,” Vindman concurred before saying Putin’s current aggression is a continuation of the build-up in 2014 when Russia annexed Crimea during the Obama administration.

What talking points is Scarborough talking about? It’s difficult to assess, but anyone who watched, say Fox & Friends Tuesday before the scheduled call could clearly see clearly conservative opinionated messaging of how weak Biden is as a leader, compared to the strong man Putin, an image that the Russian leader is eager to curry.

A better example might be how Tucker Carlson called out “bloodthirsty” Republican Senators who had the temerity to go on Fox News and support of US military aid to defend Ukraine from Putin’s aggression.

Fox News presents a remarkably patriotic message, and their on-air graphics are almost always draped in American flags so viewers really know where they stand. But lamenting the weakness of a sitting US president in advance of a call with the leader of your adversary? Well, some might argue what side you are truly pulling for. Or, at least, that seems to be the clear critique made by Scarborough here.

Watch above via MSNBC.

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/joe-sca...-delivering-talking-points-of-vladimir-putin/

 

irony
[ˈīrənē]
NOUN

1. @stumbler complaining about Russian propaganda after he's posted several hundred articles from wrong story.
   synonyms:
   thinskin, anon_de_plume, Username 1
2. a literary technique, originally used in Nazi Germany, where whatever one is doing to promote an agenda is exactly what the opposition is accused of.

 

Fox News under investigation after former host blows the whistle on alleged gender pay discrimination

Brad Reed
December 08, 2021



Fox News host Melissa Francis. (Screenshot)


Fox News is now under investigation by the New York State Department of Labor after former host Melissa Francis blew the whistle on the network for allegedly systematically underpaying female employees.

The Daily Beast reports that Fox pulled Francis off the air at a time when she was engaged in a gender-based pay discrimination dispute.

In fact, Francis's dispute with Fox was in arbitration at the time of her removal from the airwaves, which has led her to add a claim of illegal retaliation to her complaint about systematic gender discrimination.

“Ms. Francis filed a charge with the New York State Department of Labor because Fox News has not changed and continues to discriminate and retaliate against women, including those who seek equal pay for equal work,” Francis’ attorney, Kevin Mintzer, explained to The Daily Beast.

Neither Fox News nor the New York Department of Labor would confirm or deny the investigation to The Daily Beast.

t

Fox has a well established reputation as a hostile work environment for women.

Late Fox News founder Roger Ailes resigned in 2016 after he was buried in an avalanche of sexual harassment allegations filed against him by multiple Fox News employees, including Gretchen Carlson and Megyn Kelly.

The network also had to pay out a massive $32 million to settle harassment claims leveled against former host Bill O'Reilly.

https://www.rawstory.com/fox-news-gender-pay-gap/

 

I am sure treasonous conservative/Republicans are very happy about Chris Wallace leaving Fox News.


'That was a lie': Chris Wallace nails Lindsey Graham for passing tax cuts even though 'it wasn't paid for'

David Edwards
December 12, 2021



Fox News/screen grab


Fox News host Chris Wallace on Sunday called out Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) for passing tax cuts during the Trump administration that were not paid for while he opposes spending money on President Joe Biden's Build Back Better agenda.

"In 2017, all Republicans voted for the tax cuts then that added $2 trillion to the economy," Wallace said. "And in fact, you talk about budget gimmicks, it used the same budget gimmick there. For instance, saying that individual tax cuts were going to end in 2025."

Graham, however, refused to accept that comparison.

"I like giving money back to the taxpayer," he opined. "I don't like spending more money than we did in World War II and that's what we're doing right now."

"But respectfully, sir," Wallace interrupted. "What [White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki] is saying, a lot of Democrats are saying is that when President Trump and you..."

"What's that got to do with anything?" Graham shouted.

"Let me finish," Wallace continued. "[You] passed the 2017 Trump tax cut, that was a lie. It wasn't paid for."

"No," Graham replied. "What happens is you can't go beyond 10 years in terms of the budget window. We voted knowing that cutting taxes, we believed, would be good. I never said that cutting taxes -- I voted for cutting taxes. I'm against expanding the government. They're telling you it doesn't cost anything!"

Watch the video below from Fox News.

https://www.rawstory.com/chris-wallace-lindsey-graham-tax-cuts/

 

Conservative’s scathing video explains why fired CNN host Chris Cuomo was no more unethical than Fox News’ Sean Hannity




Sean Hannity (Fox News)


On December 4, CNN announced that Chris Cuomo had been “terminated…. effective immediately.” The former CNN host was fired after being inundated with accusations that he used his position as a CNN host to help his brother, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, deal with the barrage of sexual harassment allegations he was facing. Never Trump conservative Tim Miller, in a humorous but scathing video for The Bulwark, has no problem with CNN firing Cuomo — but argues that he was no more unethical than Fox News’ Sean Hannity.

In the video, Miller explains, “This week, documents from (New York State) Attorney General Tish James shed new light on Andrew’s Me Too scandal. They showed that Chris — who, remember, was ostensibly a newsman covering the story — was simultaneously running PR cleanup for his big brother. He even tried to covertly track down information about one of his accusers. So now, he’s out on his ass too. I understand wanting to provide a little brotherly advice, but this was over the line.”

The anti-Trump conservative, however, points out that “when it comes to journalists being in bed with the people they cover…. there was another cable news host who literally campaigned for Trump.”

The other cable news host that Miller is referring to is Hannity.

“Hannity was such an influential adviser to Trump that at the time, it was said he basically had a desk at the White House,” Miller notes. “And he wasn’t the only Fox News host giving Trump free under-the-table advice. The guy basically had all the anchors on speed dial.”

Miller goes on to argue that while Chris Cuomo was fired from CNN for his unethical actions, Fox News has no such standards where Trump is concerned.

“It seems to be like we have an imbalance here, where mainstream outlets and Democratic politicians are expected to have standards and resign when they don’t live up to them — while Fox and the Trumpers get to pussy-grab with impunity because their crowd doesn’t give a shit,” Miller stresses. “And nobody expects any different. So while I’m shedding no tears for Chris or Andrew, who certainly committed a bootable offense, it doesn’t seem like the journalistic rules the two sides are playing by are very fair or balanced.”


Watch the video below:




https://www.rawstory.com/conservati...no-more-unethical-than-fox-news-sean-hannity/

 

You better wear a cup guys. Liz is playing hardball.

Liz Cheney hammers Trump for refusing to act for 187 minutes — even after Sean Hannity begged him to

Sarah K. Burris
December 13, 2021





Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) on Monday made a forceful case for holding former Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows in criminal contempt of Congress.

Cheney argued that Meadows owes the committee answers -- and in particular wanted him to explain why former President Donald Trump refused to dispatch help to the Capitol for 187 minutes.

"The violence was evident to all. It was covered in real-time by almost every news channel," said Cheney. "For 187 minutes, President Trump refused to act. When action by our president was required, essential and indeed compelled in his oath to our constitution. Mr. Meadows received numerous text messages, which he has produced without any privilege claim imploring that Mr. Trump take the specific action we all knew his duty required. These text messages leave no doubt the White House knew what was happening here at the Capitol."



She explained that while the attack was underway, he even got a text message from members of the press telling him that the attack was happening.

"One text Mr. Meadows received said quote we are under siege here at the Capitol," she continued. "In a third, 'Mark, protesters are literally storming the Capitol breaking windows on doors rushing in. Is Trump going to say something?' A fourth, 'There is an armed standoff at the House Chamber door.' And another from someone inside the Capitol, 'We are all helpless.' Dozens of texts including from Trump administration officials urged immediate action by the president. Quote, 'He has to come out firmly and tell the protesters to dissipate. Someone is going to get killed.' In another, 'Mark, he needs to stop this now.' A third in all caps, 'TELL THEM TO GO HOME.' A fourth and I quote, 'POTUS needs to calm this shIt down.'"

She also revealed that the unnamed Fox News hosts who told Meadows that Trump had to do something, were Sean Hannity, an informal adviser to the president's 2020 campaign and Laura Ingraham.

"Please get him on tv, destroying everything you have accomplished," texted Ingraham.

"Can he make a statement? Ask people to leave the Capitol," texted Hannity.

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) revealed that Meadows, a former member of Congress, handed over 9,000 pages of documents before he decided he was going to declare executive privlege.

See the full statement from Cheney below:



https://www.rawstory.com/liz-cheney-mark-meadows-contempt/

 

She’s gonna stick her “RINO” horn up Trump’s ass

 

More star chamber bloviating.

 

'They're not journalists': CNN juxtaposes Fox News hosts' texts with their on-air comments on Jan. 6

David Edwards
December 14, 2021



Laura Ingraham Gage Skidmore/Flickr)


CNN host John King on Tuesday exposed the hypocrisy of Fox News hosts Sean Hannity, Brian Kilmeade and Laura Ingraham, who privately called for then-President Donald Trump to ask rioters to go home on Jan. 6.

During a panel discussion on CNN, King played clips that juxtaposed texts the hosts sent to then-Chief of Staff Mark Meadows with statements the same hosts made on the air on the evening of Jan. 6.

"The president needs to tell people in the Capitol to go home. This is hurting all of us. He is destroying his legacy," Ingraham wrote in a text message to Meadows.

But on the air that night, the Fox News host downplayed the violence.

"It was not a terrorist attack," she told her audience on Jan. 6. "It wasn't 9/11, it wasn't the worst thing that ever happened to America, it wasn't an insurrection."

King also looked at a text from Fox News host Brian Kilmeade.

"Please get him on TV... destroying everything you have accomplished," Kilmeade texted.

King then showed a clip of Kilmeade defending Trump's incitement of the violence.

"He was not saying go take the Capitol," Kilmeade said on Jan. 11. "He was going to go protest at the Capitol. He wasn't saying take the bike racks and throw them."

The CNN host gave Hannity the same treatment, juxtaposing his texts to Meadows to on-air statements downplaying the riot.

"The hypocrisy!" King said following the clips. "Number one, everything they did violated journalism ethics, reaching out to Mark Meadows. But number two -- they're not journalists -- number two, the hypocrisy. To pretend it didn't happen. On that day it was urgent, on that day the president has to do something, on that day the president has to save his legacy [and] then by that night on TV, [the riot was] not a big deal. And to this day, [the riot was] not a big deal."

"It just tells you again why it is so critical to get to the full truth of that day," he added.

Watch the video below from CNN.



https://www.rawstory.com/fox-news-texts-hypocrisy/

 

Dan Abrams Dismantles Fox News Hosts’ Selective Outrage Over the Sanctity of Leaked Texts — Using Their Own Clips
By Ken MeyerDec 16th, 2021, 8:03 am
1899 comments
Dan Abrams called out Fox News hosts angered that recently released private text messages were an invasion of privacy, but they had no compunction covering stories based on similarly released texts, from figures such as Peter Stzok or Chris Cuomo.

Abrams used the latest “Mediaite Moments” segment of his NewsNation show to focus on Congresswoman Liz Cheney’s (R-WY) release of text messages from Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and Brian Kilmeade, all of whom implored Mark Meadows to get Donald Trump to do something about his rioting supporters on January 6th.

The Fox hosts joined Meadows in railing against the text releases, but since Hannity demeaned it as a “smear” attempt, Abrams mused that “it’s not a smear if it shows you doing the right thing, right?”

Abrams switched gears to look at how Fox’s commentators have also slammed the text disclosures as an invasion of privacy, even though they were “lawfully obtained by congressional subpoena.” Abrams noted that he, too, has reservations about using private, leaked information, but “I don’t think they felt that way about the texts between, let’s say, former FBI employees Lisa Page and Peter Strzok who were involved in the Russia investigation.”

From there, Abrams rolled archive footage of Hannity delving into text messages from the Page-Strzok affair. After that, he showed Fox running with the private text messages from former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, plus leaked messages from the Hunter Biden laptop controversy.


“So apparently, they only believe that private texts are fair game if the private texts are someone else’s,” Abrams summarized. He also folded in Fox’s Todd Piro going after CNN’s Don Lemon for communicating with Jussie Smollett about his hate crime hoax.

“So texting someone that is the subject in the news is off-limits unless it’s not,” Abrams said. “Look, again, I think the Fox News hosts did the right thing in writing to Meadows, but you can’t have it both ways.”

Watch above, via NewsNation.


https://www.mediaite.com/tv/dan-abr...nctity-of-leaked-texts-using-their-own-clips/

 

This could actually hurt Fox News worse than losing a billion dollars. Fox always dominates the ratings because they lie to their viewers, feed their fear hate and anger and constantly incite them lies and misinformation demonizing the left. And that attracts nearly every treasonous conservative/Republican in the country that just love being told what they want to hear. And the more outrageous and dangerous their propaganda the more treasonous conservative/Republicans are attracted to it.

But even though false speech has never been protected by the first amendment and incitement is actually a creme Fox gets away with it by claiming sure our hosts lie but that's ok because its just entertainment and opinion. That defense has even been used in suits Fox was forced to settle.

A billion dollars though is enough to get their attention and once the courts rule that even "opinion and entertainment" can amount to defamation they are sitting ducks for future lawsuits and will have no choice but to start reigning in their lying dangerous propagandists. And treasonous conservative/Republicans will not like Fox Lite and probably look other places for their daily doses of fear, hare, and anger.

‘Slap in the face for Fox News’: Judge’s ruling shows network’s defense of its hosts’ lies isn’t working

Bob Brigham
December 17, 2021



Former NYC mayor Rudy Giuliani grasping Fox News host Sean Hannity's hand. Image via screengrab.



Fox News suffered a major setback in a Delaware courtroom when Superior Court Judge Eric M. Davis allowed a $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems to proceed.

Erik Wemple, media critic at The Washington Post, explained how the ruling will change journalism in America.

As we noted before in this space, the Fox News motion to dismiss spelled the last gasp of 'both sides-ism,' the idea that the media’s job is to place conflicting positions before the public and go home. 'There are two sides to every story,' reads the network’s motion. 'The press must remain free to cover both sides, or there will be a free press no more.' The problem with applying that principle to the months spanning the 2020 presidential election and the Jan. 6 Capitol riot is that one side was a 'big lie' — namely, that election fraud had robbed then-President Donald Trump of reelection," he explained.

Transcripts from Fox News personalities Lou Dobbs, Maria Bartiromo, Jeanine Pirro and Sean Hannity have complicated the network's defense.



"Though widely expected, the decision is a slap in the face for Fox News, whose heavy doses of outright false and innuendo-laden programming have often sheltered in the First Amendment," he explained. "During the early days of the pandemic, for example, a group in Washington state sued the network for allegedly violating consumer protections laws with its dreadful coronavirus coverage. Nonsense, ruled a judge. And who can forget the time the network wiggled out of a defamation suit stemming from Carlson’s show on the grounds that viewers don’t take his material seriously?"

He noted there is a similar lawsuit filed against Smartmatic, a different voting machines company.

"Fox News now may be running out of First Amendment runway. There’s no clear legal armor for co-opting the biggest lie in recent U.S. memory, encouraging its proponents (e.g. Sidney Powell and Rudolph W. Giuliani) to repeat it again and again, claiming that two little-known voting companies are part of the scheme — and then claiming the whole shebang is an act of journalism. That won’t work," Wemple predicted.

Read the full report.

https://www.rawstory.com/dominion-fox-news-lawsuit/

 

SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!!!! SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!!!! SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!!!!

Except those sluts and whores that keep getting knocked up.

Fox News Guest Goes on Sexist Diatribe Against Women in the Military: ‘Most of Them Are Already Pregnant’
By Michael LucianoDec 17th, 2021, 10:13 pm
513 comments


Right-wing talk radio oaf Jesse Kelly turned in another noxious performance on Tucker Carlson Tonight, this time mocking women in the United States military. He also said the military shouldn’t be “woman-friendly” or “gay-friendly,” and should have soldiers who want to sit atop a “throne of Chinese skulls.”

Fox News host Tucker Carlson kicked off the odious segment on Friday night by highlighting President Joe Biden’s nominee for Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: Christopher Grady.

Carlson played a clip of Grady at his Senate confirmation hearing being asked how he would “implement women, peace, and security within the Joint Staff.” However, the host falsely introduced it as Grady’s explanation for how he would make the U.S. military “competitive with China.”

Grady, who was confirmed by the Senate on Friday, gave a jargon-laden response to the question and mentioned the role of a “gender adviser” in the military.

Carlson turned to Kelly, who in one previous appearance referred to Kamala Harris as “Willie Brown’s bratwurst bun.” In another, he lamented the alleged futility of “going to a feminist rally and trying to find a woman who can cook.”


“Do you think the key to remaining competitive with the Chinese military is more gender advisers?” asked the host.

“Oh, there’s no question, Tucker,” Kelly facetiously replied. “I mean, China right now, and Russia, they’re both testing hypersonic missiles that can turn New York City to ash. Russia is actually developing and has developed satellites that can push our satellites out of orbit and cripple our military. Our military, though, they’re focused on the important things. We want to focus on climate change and we definitely have to make sure there are enough tampons in the restrooms at the Pentagon.”

Carlson seemed to agree.

“That’s kind of what they’re saying,” replied the host. “There’s a psychological term for this – and it escapes my memory at the moment – where there’s a massive real threat that you can’t deal with, so you scurry off and deal with imaginary threats to make yourself feel in control. That kind of feels like what we’re watching.”

Kelly’s response showed exactly why he keeps getting booked on Tucker Carlson Tonight:

Well, what we’re watching is the destruction of the U.S. military. And what we’re gonna end up seeing, Tucker, is thousands, tens of thousands, maybe hundreds thousands of Americans die. Those are the stakes of the game we’re playing here.

We don’t need a military that’s woman-friendly. We don’t need a military that’s gay-friendly, with all due respect to the Air Force. We need a military that’s flat-out hostile. We need a military full of Type A men who want to sit on a throne of Chinese skulls, but we don’t have that now. We can’t even get women off of naval vessels. That should be step one, but most of them are already pregnant anyway.

Hear gross sexism above via Fox News.


https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/jesse-kelly-mocks-women-in-the-military/

 

What in the FUCK will it take for FOX ‘NEWS’ to fire TUCKKKER?

 

Comscore: MSM ratings tank amid President Trump departure from White House

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 4:57 PM PT – Friday, December 17, 2021
Media outlets across the board are losing viewership in light of President Trump’s departure from the White House.

According to Comscore data reported in the Wall Street Journal on Friday, outlets including the Washington Post, New York Times and CNN, have all seen a decline in ratings. Politico took the biggest hit with a nearly 50 percent decline in monthly visitors.

This trend is one Trump predicted throughout his first term.

“You know what the fake news doesn’t know? They’re getting the highest ratings in the history of television. When Trump is gone, they’re all going bankrupt. They will go down, they’re going to say oh I wish…they’re going to be calling we want Trump to run again. We want him to run again,” Trump said back in November of 2020.

To fill the void, mainstream media outlets have continuously ran stories linking Trump to the events of Jan. 6, special elections and midterm elections.