Just 12 days before we say goodbye to Melania. Will we be seeing her at Biden's inauguration on Jan 20th?

 

No, Shooter doesn't think so.
Neither Melania or Donald have announced plans to attend.
Rumor has it they're headed to Scotland, but theres some issue with Visas and Covid and shit.
So it may be that Donald and Melania will just head home and wait for the cops to show up.

 

And once again @shootersa proves why we must always click on the links he posts because he is a phony, lying, fraudulent non fucking TRAITOR to the United States of America.

Here is what @shootersa's link actually says.


Mostly False
About this rating


What's True
The Clintons voluntarily returned or paid for some gifts due to a dispute over whether they had been given to the Clintons personally or to the U.S.

What's False
The Clintons were not "forced" to return any gifts, they were not found to have "stolen" any items, and the aggregate value of the objects in question was much less than $200,000.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-stole-white-house-furniture/

And now let's get back on topic.

'No better than Donald': Melania adviser says first lady is leaving White House with blood on her hands

https://www.rawstory.com/melania-trump-2649806141/

 

Oh, so rear admiral motherfucker wants to cherry pick what Snopes said about the Clintons absconding with our shit when they left the whitehouse, does he?
Well, lets see the whole thing then, MMMKAY, rear admiral motherfucker??
We can let members decide, what say?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-stole-white-house-furniture/
In January 2001, former president Bill Clinton and former first lady Hillary Clinton disclosed that they had received $190,027 worth of gifts during 2000, the final year of their eight-year tenure in 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. According to the Washington Post, the Clintons took the booty with them when they moved out of the White House:

Many of the gifts the Clintons are taking with them are from Hollywood figures, Democratic donors and a wide array of friends and associates, including his Georgetown University classmates.

Most of the gifts are artworks, flatware, furniture, china and rugs for a couple who for nearly two decades have not had a home of their own but now suddenly have two large houses, one in Northwest Washington, the other in Chappaqua, N.Y.

The rules governing the acceptance of gifts by the president and other federal employees divide such items into two categories: those received from foreign officials or governments (foreign official gifts), and those received from the American public (domestic gifts). The president is allowed to keep foreign official gifts if their worth is under a certain threshold; gifts whose worth is over the threshold belong to the people of the United States and must be purchased at fair market price from the General Services Administration. No such limitation applies to domestic gifts, although the law requires disclosure of each individual gift valued at more than a minimal amount ($260 as of the end of Clinton’s term of office). The law also states that federal employees, including the president and first lady, may not solicit gifts.




As was pointed out at the time, the rules for U.S. senators are different. Senators may not accept gifts valued at more than $50, and may not accept multiple gifts from individual donors totaling more than $100. Hillary Clinton took office as New York senator on 3 January 2001, but because the gifts in question were reported as received while she was still first lady, the rule wasn’t applied. At least one critic, Charles Lewis of the Center for Public Integrity, said that even so, the timing gave the appearance Sen. Clinton was “enriching herself from public service.”

There was nothing illegal about the Clintons keeping personal gifts that had been given to them in the White House, but the $190,027 total price tag of their final year’s haul elicited criticism, which the former first couple sought to stem by announcing they would voluntarily pay for a portion of those gifts, an amount totaling $86,000.

Days later, the New York Times reported that the Clintons would return an additional $28,000 or more worth of gifts that donors complained had been earmarked for the White House permanent collection, not the Clintons’ personal use. Ultimately, the total worth of gifts returned by the Clintons to the U.S. government amounted to nearly $50,000, the Times later reported.

A statement from Clinton spokesman James E. Kennedy attempting to explain the flap proved less than enlightening:

A statement issued tonight by James E. Kennedy for Mr. Clinton’s office said that all the chairs, tables, rugs and other furnishings taken for their homes in Washington and Chappaqua, N.Y., had been registered as personal gifts by the White House gift office.

“Every item accepted by the Clintons was identified by the White House gift office as a gift to them,” the statement said, adding that the administrative staff at the White House had “reviewed each of the items against the official list of White House property to ensure every gift was properly handled; none of these items was on that list.”

The park service handles permanent donations, officials said. Personal gifts to the president and his family are recorded separately through the White House gift office.

The statement offered no explanation for the apparent appearance of the gifts — which include sofas, a rug and a kitchen table with chairs — on both lists. Betty Monkman, the White House curator, did not respond to an interview request.

All told, the Clintons paid back or returned approximately $136,000 worth of furniture, artwork, china and other household items they had kept upon leaving office, with $86,000 of that total consisting of personal gifts they would presumably have been allowed to retain but decided to pay for to avoid the appearance of impropriety. About $50,000 of the total comprised items they had removed but were later determined to belong to the government.

To say the latter were “stolen” is to say more than we know — the removal of the questioned items could have been based a clerical mistake — but in any case an accurate accounting of those items’ worth puts it at only a quarter of what has been alleged: $50,000, not $200,000.

A House government reform subcommittee conducted a year-long investigation concluding in 2002 which found that many of the gifts received by the Clintons had been undervalued, some were never reported and some were listed as lost or missing. No allegations of illegality were made, but the subcommittee’s report recommended that the existing, overly complex system for overseeing the receipt, valuation and disposition of presidential gifts be overhauled.

 

Melania Photos Shoot During Riot Leaked

 

Well, it is thighs ....

 

Thing is, she was involved in a photo shoot, a photographer was taking pictures of various items and features in the White House for a book she was putting together. Good thing @slutwolf was wrong about which building was attacked, she could have be injured.

 

The New Trump Family - SNL

 

Who Has the Best Melania Trump Impersonation?

 

5 more days and its bye bye Melania. What are the odds makers predicting about how long before the divorce.

 

Finally with just two days before we say adieu to Melania. You can have your thread back.

But just one last parting kiss

 

I ain't so sure about them getting it back.

 

So members are free to post now, thank you

 

David Corn
@DavidCornDC
This is disgusting. Close to let-them-eat-cake level of detachment. Just one Melania inanity: "She had the [bowling] balls redone with lettering 'The President’s House,' not 'The People’s House.'" The Trumps desecrated the White House in values and in interior decorating.

CNN Politics
@CNNPolitics
Before her departure, which will see a break from tradition by her and her husband refusing to meet with the incoming first family, Melania Trump has written an essay on the restoration projects she oversaw https://cnn.it/35QJbQY
10:57 AM · Jan 18, 2021

 

Mrs. Betty Bowers
@BettyBowers
Melania hilariously thinks we want to listen to SIX MINUTES and FIFTY-THREE SECONDS of that vulgar, rude fraud reading insincere words written by someone else off a teleprompter in a tedious "Farewell Message." Hard pass.

4:10 PM · Jan 18, 2021

 

I read that CNN article condemning Melania for "Breaking with tradition" by not inviting Jill Biden over for tea or something........why, so she can say no, and if she did invite Jill, CNN would scream, Oh the outrage

 

Go ahead, I've given it back to you. Post away!

 

Forum members appreciate your leniency

 

CNN’s New Day Roasts Melania Trump for Birtherism, Snubbing Jill Biden, and Historically-Low Approval Rating
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnns-ne...l-biden-and-historically-low-approval-rating/