1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from [email protected] or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
  2. thinskin

    thinskin Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    32,838
    Conspiracy charges next!



    Thinskin
     
    • Like Like x 2
  3. thinskin

    thinskin Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    32,838
    • Like Like x 2
  4. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,171
    Now this is going to get very interesting. Let's see who Giuliani was texting and what they were saying.

    Dominion Voting Systems Sues Giuliani for $1 Billion in Damages Over Baseless Election Fraud Claims

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/domin...n-damages-over-baseless-election-fraud-claims
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. freethinker

    freethinker Pervy Bear

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,322
    Rudy Giuliani sued by Dominion Voting Systems over false election claims
    By Nick Corasaniti
    The New York Times |
    Jan 25, 2021 at 7:55 AM

    Dominion Voting Systems filed a defamation lawsuit Monday against Rudy Giuliani, the lawyer for Donald Trump and former mayor of New York who played a key role in the former president’s monthslong effort to subvert the 2020 election.

    The 107-page lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, accuses Giuliani of carrying out “a viral disinformation campaign about Dominion” made up of “demonstrably false” allegations, in part to enrich himself through legal fees and his podcast.

    The suit seeks damages of more than $1.3 billion and is based on more than 50 statements Giuliani made at legislative hearings, on Twitter, on his podcast and in the conservative news media, where he spun a fictitious narrative of a plot by one of the biggest voting machine manufacturers in the country to flip votes to President Joe Biden.

    Giuliani, one of Trump’s closest advisers and confidants, has faced continuing fallout for his highly visible efforts to reverse the election outcome. This month, the chairman of the New York state Senate’s judiciary committee formally requested that the state court system strip Giuliani of his law license.

    Giuliani did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    [​IMG]
    Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, listens as Trump speaks during a news briefing in the White House in Washington on Sept. 27, 2020. (Al Drago / The New York Times)
    Taken together with a lawsuit the company filed this month against Sidney Powell, another lawyer who was allied with Trump, the suit represents a point-by-point rebuke of one of the more outlandish conspiracy theories surrounding last year’s election. The president’s allies had contended that the voting machine company — which was also used in states during Trump’s victory in the 2016 election, has been tested by government agencies, and was used in states Trump carried in 2020 — was somehow involved in a rigged election, partly as a result of ties to a long-deceased Venezuelan dictator.

    “Dominion was not founded in Venezuela to fix elections for Hugo Chávez,” the suit says. “It was founded in 2002 in John Poulos’ basement in Toronto to help blind people vote on paper ballots.” The suit later adds that the headquarters for the company’s United States subsidiary is in Denver.

    Laying out a timeline of Giuliani’s comments about Dominion on Twitter, his podcast and Fox News, the company notes that Giuliani avoided mentioning Dominion in court, where he could have faced legal ramifications for falsehoods. “Notably, not a single one of the three complaints signed and filed by Giuliani and other attorneys for the Trump Campaign in the Pennsylvania action contained any allegations about Dominion,” the lawsuit says.

    The lawsuit also links Giuliani’s false statements about Dominion to the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, noting that he mentioned the company in his speech at a rally for Trump before the attack, as well as numerous times on social media as the Capitol was breached.

    “Having been deceived by Giuliani and his allies into thinking that they were not criminals — but patriots ‘Defend(ing) the Republic’ from Dominion and its co-conspirators — they then bragged about their involvement in the crime on social media,” the suit states.

    Thomas A. Clare, a lawyer representing Dominion, said that the riot had not factored into the decision to sue Giuliani, but that it did show just how seriously Trump’s followers had taken the falsehoods told about the election.

    “From a defamation law perspective, it just demonstrates the depth to which these statements sink in to people,” Clare said in an interview. “That people don’t just read them and tune them out. It goes to the core of their belief system, which puts them in a position to take action in the real world.”

    Dominion is a major manufacturer of voting machine equipment in the United States, second only to Election Systems & Software. Different models of Dominion machines were used in more than two dozen states — red, blue and battleground — during the 2020 election.

    The company had previously warned Giuliani, sending a letter in late December that told him to preserve all records of his claims and stop making false statements, and warned that legal action was imminent. But Giuliani continued with his false claims of fraud, even arguing on Twitter days after receiving the letter that “phony Dominion voting machines” needed to be investigated.

    As recently as last week, Giuliani was on his New York City-based radio show saying that “so long as you have Dominion, there is clear and present danger” that election results could be rigged. He added that he had “boxes of evidence to support his claims.”

    Dominion has indicated that it plans to file more lawsuits. The suit against Giuliani says he acted with other prominent conservatives and news networks, including Mike Lindell, Lou Dobbs, Fox News, Fox Business, Newsmax and One America News Network.

    “There will certainly be others,” Clare said. “There are other individuals who have spoken the big lie and have put forward these defamatory statements about Dominion, but then there are also players in the media that have amplified it.”

    Clare left open the possibility of litigation against Trump.

    “We’re not ruling anybody out,” he said. “Obviously, this lawsuit against the president’s lawyer moves one step closer to the former president and understanding what his role was and wasn’t.”

    The threats from Dominion have prompted some conciliatory responses from conservative news outlets hoping to avoid a legal battle. This month, the American Thinker, a conservative website, posted an apologetic note saying that its reports about Dominion “are completely false and have no basis in fact” and that “it was wrong for us to publish these false statements.”

    Giuliani was one of the main public faces of the effort to reverse the election results, with Trump rarely appearing in public and preferring to send out broadsides on Twitter against the democratic process.

    Dominion argues that Giuliani profited significantly from his false claims, noting that he “reportedly demanded $20,000 per day” for his legal services to Trump and “cashed in by hosting a podcast where he exploited election falsehoods to market gold coins, supplements, cigars and protection from ‘cyberthieves.’ "

    The lawsuit notes just how quickly and widely the lies and false narratives had spread leading up to the riot at the Capitol. “Over a three-hour period on Dec. 21, 2020, the terms ‘dominion’ and ‘fraud’ were tweeted out together by more than 2,200 users with over 8.75 million total followers,” the suit says.

    The reach of the disinformation about the company brought countless threats of violence against employees, the suit claims. One employee received text messages stating: “We are already watching you. Come clean and you will live.” A voice mail message to customer support said, “We’re bringing back the firing squad.”

    Because of these threats, Dominion has spent $565,000 on personal security, according to the lawsuit. The company claimed to have incurred $1.17 million in total expenses relating to the disinformation campaign after the election.

    “Giuliani’s statements,” the suit states, “were calculated to — and did in fact — provoke outrage and cause Dominion enormous harm.”

    c.2020 The New York Times Company
     
    • Like Like x 2
    1. freethinker
      Looks like Stumbles and I found the story at the same time.
       
      freethinker, Jan 25, 2021
      thinskin likes this.
    2. stumbler
      I appreciate you posting the whole article. And I bet if I'd have had two more sips of coffee your article would have appeared first. I will add a detail though that one legal analyst pointed out, Dominion really has no incentive to settle this with Rudy out of court. The only way they can be truly vindicated is through a public trial where all the facts come out,
       
      stumbler, Jan 25, 2021
      gammaXray, anon_de_plume and thinskin like this.
    3. thinskin
      I hope Rudy ends up destitute!

      ts
       
      thinskin, Jan 25, 2021
      anon_de_plume and stumbler like this.
  6. thinskin

    thinskin Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    32,838
    Do you think Rudy has got the dosh?



    Thinskin
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,171
    I have been saying this from the beginning. Its actually really hard to sue someone for libel or defamation especially when it involves public figures. But businesses can sue your ass off for even just making an honest mistake. And all Trump's traitors are just sitting ducks on this one. Which is why nearly every far right media that broadcast the election fraud lies about Dominion have now scrubbed their sites of any mention of Dominion and made really big public retractions. Because they know they can get sued for that.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. freethinker

    freethinker Pervy Bear

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,322
    Watchdog probes if DOJ officials tried to overturn election
    [​IMG]
    By MICHAEL BALSAMO
    19 mins ago

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department’s inspector general is launching an investigation to examine whether any former or current department officials “engaged in an improper attempt” to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

    Inspector General Michael Horowitz said Monday that the investigation will investigate allegations concerning the conduct of former and current Justice Department officials but will not extend to other government officials.

    The Justice Department watchdog investigation follows a report in The New York Times that a former assistant attorney general, Jeffrey Clark, had been discussing a plan with then-President Donald Trump to oust the acting attorney general and try to challenge the results of the 2020 race by falsely saying there had been widespread election fraud.


    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer demanded the inspector general launch a probe “into this attempted sedition." The New York Democrat said it was “unconscionable a Trump Justice Department leader would conspire to subvert the people’s will.”


    The watchdog's probe is part of a growing number of efforts underway to investigate the attempts by Trump and his allies to subvert the election results. The moves culminated in a deadly Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol and a second impeachment of Trump, this time for inciting an insurrection. Also on Monday, the voting machine company Dominion Systems filed a defamation suit against Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani for his repeatedly false claims about widespread voting fraud in the election.

    Election officials across the country, along with Trump's former attorney general, William Barr, have confirmed there was no widespread fraud in the election. Republican governors in Arizona and Georgia, key battleground states won by Democrat Joe Biden, also vouched for the integrity of the elections in their states. Nearly all the legal challenges from Trump and his allies have been dismissed by judges, including two tossed by the U.S. Supreme Court.

    AP Report
     
    • Like Like x 2
    1. thinskin
      I flagged this a few days ago but certain people need to go to jail!

      ts
       
      thinskin, Jan 25, 2021
      gammaXray and stumbler like this.
  9. Bron Zeage

    Bron Zeage I am a river to my people

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    13,587
    In the case of Giuliani and Powell, they have claimed to have evidence that Dominion was part of a criminal conspiracy. This puts it beyond a personal opinion, into a statement of fact. It's the difference between a Yelp review that says "China Moon's buffet sucks" and "I saw a skinned cat hanging in China Moon's freezer."

    It is difficult to prosecute libel in civil court, but when the defendant has publically accused someone of criminal action, the only defense is to show the charges are likely to be true, based on all known information. Giuliani will have to bring more to court than a day drinking civil service clerk.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    1. stumbler
      First of all our whole legal concept is based on the standard of a reasonable person. And in the case of Kraken et al would a reasonable person or reasonable lawyer believe they really had evidence. And the reason that won't pass is because they got push back and proven wrong and they kept screaming about it anyway.

      But there is a c0mpletely different standard when it comes to businesses suing someone. All they have to do is show damages.
       
      stumbler, Jan 25, 2021
    2. Bron Zeage
      Truth is a defense in any libel or slander case. Damage assessment can be a difficult point. The Reverend Jerry Falwell(the preacher, not the cuckold lawyer) sued Larry Flint after Hustler printed a satire about Falwell having sex with his mother in an outhouse. Falwell destroyed his own case when he testified that no one in the world would think it was true. No damage done except for Falwell's butt hurt.
       
      Bron Zeage, Jan 25, 2021
      anon_de_plume and stumbler like this.
    3. stumbler
      That is something that amazed me. The right really was trying to end the first amendment as we know it. They were well on their way. And it was Larry Flint that took them on going all the way to the Supreme Court where the justices reaffirmed that the first amendment was very broad and protected both satire and porn.

      I will always thank him for that becasue another thing he beat was the biggest fraud to ever claim he's a lawyer, Jerry Spence. That had personal satisfaction to me.
       
      stumbler, Jan 26, 2021
  10. thinskin

    thinskin Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    32,838
    Can't wait!

    Thinskin
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,171
    And good ol' Horowitz. I bet Trump wishes he could have figured out a way to fire him. He writes really good reports.
     
  12. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    Maricopa County, Ariz. voting system audit latest
    https://www.oann.com/maricopa-county-ariz-voting-system-audit-latest/
    OAN Newsroom
    UPDATED 9:32 AM PT – Monday, January 25, 2020

    Republicans are still fighting in multiple states to ensure confidence and clarity in future elections. OAN White House Correspondent Jenn Pellegrino has the latest on that fight and a highly anticipated audit in Arizona.

    upload_2021-1-26_2-14-20.png
     
  13. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    If the Congressional leftist put forth as much effort in investigating everything....even their fellow leftists as they have put forth investigating Trump, I'd have to say that D.C. wouldn't be the swamp urchin filled cesspool that it is today.

    However, we know that the establishment dont work for those that elected them....even hack fuck can recognize that, as hack fuck supports the swamp filled establishment urchins.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    Sen. Paul speaks out on alleged voting irregularities in 2020 election

    OAN Newsroom
    UPDATED 1:20 PM PT – Monday, January 25, 2021

    Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has continued to firmly assert that voter fraud occurred in the 2020 election. In an interview on Sunday, Paul said there were instances of people voting twice, dead people voting and illegal immigrants voting during the election.

    Paul also noted in several states, voting laws were unconstitutionally changed by secretary of states.

    “There were several states in which the law was changed by the secretary of state and not the state legislature. To me those are clearly unconstitutional, and I think there’s still a chance that those actually do finally work their way up to the Supreme Court,” Paul explained.

    Although Paul was outlining concerns millions of Americans have expressed, ABC talk show host George Stephanopoulous attempted to dismiss the claims as dishonest.

    “People coming from the liberal side like you, you immediately say everything is a lie instead of saying there are two sides to everything. Historically what would happen is if I said that I thought there was fraud, you would interview someone else that would say there wasn’t,” Paul stated. “But now you insert yourself in the middle and say the absolute fact is everything I’m saying is a lie.”

    Paul’s rebuttal did not stop the former Clinton White House adviser’s attacks, prompting the Republican once again to call out the mainstream media.

    Despite liberal outlets animus towards claims of election fraud, Paul said he will be working to address alleged irregularities over the next two years.

    “In Wisconsin, tens of thousands of absentee votes had only the name on them and no address. Historically, those were thrown out, this time they weren’t. They made special accommodations because they said, ‘oh it’s pandemic and people forgot what their address was,’ so they changed the law after the fact,” Paul said. “That is wrong, that’s unconstitutional, and I plan on spending the next two years going around state to state and fixing these problems, and I wont be cast out by liberals in the media who say ‘there’s no evidence here and you’re a liar if you talk about election fraud,’ no, let’s have an open debate, it’s a free country.”

    Paul stressed that alleged irregularities need to be investigated in order to increase confidence in our elections.
     
  15. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,171
    1. shootersa
      The witch hunt continues.
      Resistance is futile.
      Surrender Dorothy.
       
      shootersa, Jan 26, 2021
    2. anon_de_plume
      How does NOT donating to a political candidate based on your convictions translate into a "witch hunt"? Boy, you love playing the victim.
       
      anon_de_plume, Jan 27, 2021
  16. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,171
    stupid people.jpg
     
    1. shootersa
      How ironic.
      Stumbler posts the writing of a man incarcerated ond murdered in a Concentration camp.
      Exactly the fate he envisions for any and all who would dare oppose the despicable world plan.
       
      shootersa, Jan 26, 2021
  17. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,171
  18. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,170
    Yeah! Like delusion... Or insanity... Or ignorance... Or uninformed... Or...
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  19. freethinker

    freethinker Pervy Bear

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,322
    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,171